Wednesday 30 September 2015

D-eb31e Structure

Having read through most of the screenwriting books I have a hold of, I now felt comfortable to start writing the structure of the film.

Both 'Save The Cat!' and 'Writing Short Films: Structure and Content for Screenwriters' have been very helpful in clearly laying out how your film should be structured to be successful. Although there are exceptions to these rules, in my research I noticed that the films that did follow these rules, I enjoyed the most.

In Save The Cat! the structure is laid out as such:

Opening Image- Sets the tone, mood, type and scope of the film. Gives a before shot of the character.
Theme Stated- Someone makes a statement to the main character, an offhand remark.
Set-Up- The Hero, The Stakes, The goal of the story (Opening Image and Theme Stated come under this)
Catalyst- Moments which knock the world down that you’ve just showed the audience
Break into Two- Hero decides to leave the set-up world and go into a new one.
B story- It gives us a break from the main story, but supports it.
Fun and Games- Provides the promise of the premise. A more light-hearted section of the script.
Midpoint- Something negative or positive happens here that changes the motion of the script.
Bad Guys Close In- The bad guy tightens their grip on the hero, who is about to suffer a fall.
All is Lost- False defeat, opposite to midpoint. Stick a whiff of death in there.
Dark Night of the Soul- A moment of defeat where the character and the audience know it. Short.
Break into Three- The idea to solve the problem emerges. A and B story combine.
Finale- Dispatching the bad guys, leading to a triumph for the hero.
Final Image- opposite to the opening image, showing how change has occurred.

In general I found this to be true of short films as well as feature length films. However, as feature films have the time to explore multiple concepts, things such as a B-story might not be included in a short film.

In  Writing Short Films: Structure and Content for Screenwriters I found the structure to be very similar in Save The Cat! However, it is more specified for short films:

Setup (1-3)- Protagonist and Main conflict (Something the character wants and something it needs, and something to conflict with these)- Main Exposition (What the audience needs to know in relation to the character and situation)- Inciting Incident (The catalyst that sets the hero in motion to pursue what he wants and needs)- The Problem and Sub-Problem (A main problem that has consequences for the character.)
The Rising Action (4-14)- The Antagonist (A character that personifies the hero's obstacles)- The Plan (The hero's plan to get what he wants that shows surprises and presents further obstacles)- Obstacles (Something that opposes the protagonist as he attempts to achieve his goal.)- Complications (Something unexpected that can cause a change in action.)- The Reversal (An unexpected event that turns the direction of the film 180 degrees)- Crisis (An attempt to capture the goal by the hero, but is temporarily thwarted)- The Main Crisis (The conflict intensifies and increases)
The Climax & Resolution (15-20)- Climax (The highest, most exciting point in the drama)- Resolution (Tying up loose ends and solving problems/falling action)

I found this equally useful as I could compare with the other structure type and find that they were very similar. They both explain why each point is necessary using relevant examples. When I then went on to create my structure, I decided to mainly use the one from Save The Cat! as I found it a little bit easier to understand, however I always used the other structure for reference to make sure I was putting it into a short film context. This is the structure that came out:


  1. Jarvis comes into the cafe with a box of office belongings dressed like he’s just come from work and has had a rough day. He orders a black coffee. Sits down and starts looking at a picture from the box.
  2. A man comes in and sits opposite him. The man, we discover, is his brother and the brother is showing concern over his well-being (job etc.) He sees Jarvis looking at the picture and warns Jarvis to not spend too long chasing something unattainable.
  3. Jarvis goes to the toilet and pulls a pill from a small bag in his pocket which he takes. As he’s washing his hands a woman comes into the toilet and starts talking to him seductively.
  4. He returns to the table and the woman is talking over his brother’s shoulder as he has two conversations at once. Jarvis begins to hallucinate even more and gets up and follows the woman as she walks away from him.
  5. Meanwhile, the brother is trying to suss what Jarvis is up to as he starts wandering aimlessly around the cafe, talking to himself.
  6. Inside the hallucination, Jarvis is trying to seduce the woman. However everything he does is also reflected in the outside world (e.g. kissing the woman looks like he’s kissing the air or inanimate objects).
  7. Eventually the woman agrees to be with him
  8. However, she will only give him what he wants if he chooses her over his brother.
  9. He hallucinates an image of his brother, chained up and screaming. Outside of the hallucination, Jarvis is now screaming at the top of his lungs and his brother tries to calm him down. He lies him down on the floor as Jarvis starts convulsing, he searches his pockets and finds the drugs.
  10. Jarvis looks into a mirror and he is suddenly gaunt, his eyes glazed over like a slave or a tortured soul.
  11. The brother has now called an ambulance, and medical staff are around him trying to hook him up to liquids, attempting to stabilize him. Jarvis feels this in the hallucination, and has a moment of clarity.
  12. Jarvis sees that Debbie is trying to harm the chained up brother, and jumps in between them. Debbie throws herself at them both, her hand touches his chest. Outside of the hallucination, Jarvis goes limp and the brother is crying, asking if the ambulance staff if he’s going to be ok.

As of right now I still don't have an ending for the film. I know various ways it could end, but I want to start writing it and decide on that later as myself and Laura are still in a debate about it.



Sunday 27 September 2015

Personal Project Initial Idea

While I was working on my installation sound piece in the gallery in Year 2, which involved data of a biological kind, which I will link down below



While I was working on this I was getting a frustrating amount of spam emails, which may seem funny, but I was trying to work! And now I had to wade through loads of rubbish to get anywhere! This is where the idea came from. When I yet again received another email stating I'd won $1,000,000 I began to wonder how much I would have won over the years of having my email account if these emails were genuine? And I began to realise that this was an interesting topic to explore.

Having seen the work of Aram Bartholl last year, who's website you can access here. I thought there might be something worth exploring.

However, I am not sure what form this will take yet, but I am looking to get a result out of this idea.

Script Development and Research

In the first few weeks back in Farnham I have begun writing and researching the script for our film. To start with I read a few books on screenwriting to aid me with the structure and how to build a stronger film. Although most of the books I have are made for feature film writing, I also have read a book on short film writing to bring it all into the context I need it in.

The books I have read are:

Syd Field's Screenplay: The Foundations of Screenwriting
Linda Cowgill's Writing Short Films: Structure and Content for Screenwriters
Blake Snyder's Save The Cat!
Mark Axelrod's Constructing Dialogue: Screenwriting from Citizen Kane to Midnight in Paris

I all found these very helpful in trying to build a structure for the film, and also for just general screenwriting tips and advice.

The next step was to screen films which relate to the subject matter we are trying to address and review their structure, and why the do or don't work. I analysed their structures to see where the main plot points were and then made a note of one line or two to about what I thought of them. I won't give all the details, but here is generally what I said:

Feature Films

Altered States (1980)- Not enough of a likeable main character, I'm not rooting for him as I feel sorry for his wife.
Trainspotting (1996)-Very funny, likeable main character even though he's a bit 'damaged goods'. Clear story, clear plot points.
127 Hours (2010)- Interesting exploration of hallucination, killer sound design,

Short Films

The Going Away Party (2015)- A bit all over the place, no real character development.

                  
                  The Going Away Party from Connor Hurley on Vimeo.

Good Grief (2015)- Funny, clear story. Some character development but I don't root for the main character.


                  
                  Good Grief from Jim Owen on Vimeo.

Fallin' Floyd (2013)- Funny, uplifting, good character development. However the demon is too cute, I feel sad when it leaves.


                 
                  Fallin' Floyd from il Luster on Vimeo.

I have yet to look at a few more films, but I now feel comfortable doing the structure of the film.

Summer Work and Adventures

Over the summer, having discussed our third year film ideas with Laura, Tom, Shahid, and Laura, I went away and started working on the character biographies. Laura also started on a version of the script to start off from.

I have been using Adobe Story for the character biographies as it provides easy script formatting and can be accessed anywhere as it is completely on cloud.


Also, over the summer I went to a masterclass with Glenn Freemantle, who did the sound design on the likes of 127 Hours (2010) and Gravity (2013). I found it personally fascinating and he gave great advice and industry secrets on how to approach sound design which I think will really help me this year.
A photo posted by Lucy Jones (@haveyouseenlucy) on

Towards the end of the summer I also went to an exhibition called 'Soundscapes' at The National Gallery, thanks to Kat, who notified me of it. It was basically an exhibition which showed different sound artists' responses to different chosen paintings. I found it really interesting, even though the Guardian and Telegraph gave it bad reviews!

Find out more info: http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/soundscapes/

Finally, right before we came back, myself and Laura sat down and discussed our ideas for the film, and I feel developed them further. I am now working on the script whilst she works on the budgeting and initial pre-production organisation.